Intracytoplasmic Sperm Injection Procedures for Males

 

The primary treatment option for infertile men with obstructive azoospermia was vasovasostomy or vasoepididymostomy for reconstruct able causes, or implantation of an alloplastic artificial spermatocele for subsequent percutaneous retrieval of sperm for unreconstructed able causes, such as congenital absence of the vas deferens.

Since the first US report of a successful delivery from in vitro fertilization (IVF) in 1982, progress in the field of assisted reproduction and micromanipulation has been truly dramatic, particularly in the area of male factor infertility, offering couples considered irreversibly infertile, 


Results:

The consequences of ICSI are being used increasingly in the absence of abnormal semen parameters or male factors the role of male infertility per se in the analysis of outcomes has become less evident. There is often a masking of data pertaining to male-factor infertility as ICSI is being used to increase the odds of successful live birth in couples with not only male causes of infertility, but also cervical causes, or combined causes. The origin of the sperm and type of infertility are seldom examined and the results are not stratified according to these important exposures.



Obstructive & Non-obstructive Azoospermia:

The major subgroups of male infertility, obstructive azoospermia (OA), non-obstructive azoospermia (NOA) and severe Oligozoospermia (SO) seem likely to have different implications in terms of outcomes for the offspring. In the case of Oligozoospermia there will be a normal spermatogenesis but some mechanical problem preventing passage of the sperm such as in men who have damage to the epididymis because of infection or inflammation or have had vasectomies. Oligozoospermia can be the result of congenital bilateral absence of the vas deferens in men with or without clinically evident cystic fibrosis. With non-obstructive azoospermia. This is often due to genetic defects.

Testicular sperm extraction: (TESE)

 

TESE is a surgical sperm retrieval procedure used in subfertility treatment for men who have no sperm in their ejaculate.

 

TESE suitable for:

TESE is used for male with both obstructive & non-obstructive Azoospermia. These men have no sperm in their ejaculate because either there is a blockage in the route between the site of sperm production (the testes) and ejaculation or because there is a partial or complete failure in sperm production in the testes.

Conventional TESE is usually performed under local, or sometimes spinal or general, anesthesia.    An incision in the median raphe of the scrotum is made. The testicle and epididymis are then visible. From here incisions are through the outer covering of the testis to retrieve biopsies of seminiferous tubules, the structures which contain sperm. The incision is closed with sutures and each sample is assessed under a microscope to confirm the presence of sperm. Following extraction, sperm is often cryogenically preserved for future use, but can also be used fresh.

 

When TESE is done:

The consultant may advise that TESE is carried out in advance of any fertility treatment to confirm that sperm production is occurring. If suitable numbers of sperm are identified on this occasion, it is sometimes possible to freeze the testicular extract and to thaw and use this sample for subsequent treatment. More commonly however, once it has been confirmed that sperm production is occurring, the TESE procedure is repeated on the day of the egg retrieval and the fresh sample used for ICSI. Again, providing that there are suitable numbers of sperm present, the sample can sometimes be frozen for use in future treatment cycles

 

Micro-TESE:

Micro-TESE, or micro dissection testicular sperm extraction, includes the use of an operating microscope. This allows the surgeon to observe regions of seminiferous tubules of the testes that have more chance of containing spermatozoa. The procedure is more invasive than conventional TESE, requiring general anesthetic, and usually used only in patients with non-obstructive azoospermia. Similarly to TESE, an incision is made in the scrotum and surface of the testicle to expose seminiferous tubules. However, this exposure is much wider in micro-TESE.

 

This allows exploration of the incision under the microscope to identify areas of tubules more likely to contain more sperm. If none can be identified, biopsies are instead taken at random from a wide range of locations. The incision is closed with sutures. Samples are re-examined post-surgery to locate and then purify sperm.

When compared with conventional TESE, micro-TESE generally has higher success in extracting sperm; as such, micro-TESE is preferable in cases of non-obstructive azoospermia, where infertility is caused by a lack of sperm production rather than a blockage. In these cases, micro-TESE is more likely to yield sufficient sperm for use in ICSI.

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Comments